Posts Tagged ‘Florida DUI cases’

Position on Intoxilyzer 5000 Source Codes Results in Prosecutor Motion to Disqualify Judge

Friday, May 27th, 2011

In an interesting development, the Orange-Osceola State Attorney’s Office has filed a motion to have a judge disqualified from several pending DUI cases because Orange County Judge C. Jeffrey Arnold has indicated that if Florida DUI attorneys request source codes for the Intoxilyzer 5000, he will direct that the codes must be provided.  The Intoxilyzer 5000 is the only approved breath test device that is approved for use in Florida DUI prosecutions.  The source codes provide information on how the device works.  However, the company that produces the devices refuses to provide the source codes based on the grounds of trade secrets creating serious problems for prosecutors in Florida DUI cases.  Over two hundred cases have already been dismissed because of the failure to provide source codes.

Judge Arnold has indicated that he does not plan to recuse himself.  Judge Arnold has indicated that he is merely avoiding re-litigating the issue because Florida appellate court decisions and rulings of other judges have already established that DUI defendants are entitled to access to the source-code information.  He has indicated that his statements regarding requiring the source codes in future cases merely saves taxpayers money and reduces cluttering the court’s docket by re-litigating the issue.

The battle over the admissibility of Intoxilyzer 5000 results and the refusal of the manufacturer of the device CMI Inc. to provide the source codes continues to provide an effective defense strategy in Florida DUI cases.  Prosecutors now face the prospect of having to proceed on DUI cases without breath test results.  This means that if there are no other chemical results, such as a blood test, the prosecutor must rely on officer observations, patterns of erratic driving behavior or field sobriety testing (FSTs).  A driver also is not required to submit to FSTs.

If a driver refuses FSTs and any breath test results are excluded, this generally leaves nothing more than officer testimony regarding red water eyes, slurred speech and the odor of alcohol along with any observed erratic driving is the only available evidence.  Erratic driving can be the result of many other things including driver fatigue, illness and other factors.  Watery eyes can also be the result of many other factors including allergies.  The odor of alcohol establishes nothing other than a driver may have consumed something with alcohol.  Cough syrup contains alcohol and may generate an odor of alcohol.  More importantly, consumption of alcohol prior to driving is only illegal if the amount of alcohol is above a certain level.

Ultimately, our experienced Florida DUI defense attorneys will challenge Intoxilyzer results, officer observations, FST results and the police procedures involved in your stop and subsequent arrest.  We will fight to get your Florida DUI charges dismissed or substantially reduced.  If you are facing pending Florida DUI charges, contact our Florida DUI attorney today so that we can help you start rebuilding your life.

Florida DUI Cases Are Highly Susceptible to False Evidence Provided by an Arresting Officer

Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

While facing an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol is typically an anxiety riddled experience, it is even more upsetting when the charges are based on a falsified or inaccurate police report.  The common perception amongst many people is that a DUI case is typically based on scientific evidence such as highly accurate chemical test results so there is little room for error or manipulation of the evidence by an arresting officer.  To the contrary, chemical testing can be highly inaccurate and cases all over the U.S. are being thrown out because of false or inaccurate police reports.  As recently as September, 79 cases were thrown out by a Sacramento, CA court because of falsified police reports.  The thought of facing DUI charges when you were not under the influence of alcohol is disturbing, but it is also a more realistic possibility than many people imagine.

One of the most common practices used in falsifying DUI reports is what is called a “xeroxed report.”  Basically, the officer has a report that is prepared and fills in the blanks rather than preparing an individualized report or a computer template that makes it look like a report is unique but really is no more than filling in blanks.  This practice is more common than you might think because it saves the officer time and effort.  However, an experienced Florida DUI attorney can identify this type of practice by comparing multiple police reports prepared by the officer.  If the officer is simply filling in blanks or completing a template, the same language will be used rather than unique descriptions and account of what happened in your DUI case.

Police reports in Florida DUI cases may also be falsified by the officer simply lying or misrepresenting the facts.  For example, the officer may claim you gave consent to search your vehicle during a DUI stop, lie about giving you field sobriety tests or provide an inaccurate account of the results.  Many times there may be no other evidence of what actually happened during a DUI stop other than your word against that of the police officer.  The officer may distort his observations of you during the initial stop claiming to smell alcohol on your breath, observe red watery eyes or state that your speech was slurred.  The officer’s observations or distorted field sobriety testing may be critical evidence.

If you do not have an experienced Florida DUI defense attorney, it can be very difficult to determine that a police report is false or inaccurate and even harder to prove it.  A local DUI defense attorney will be familiar with the officers in your jurisdiction that have a reputation for having strikingly similar police reports across multiple cases.  Your Florida DUI attorney may also elect to request copies of other DUI arrest reports prepared by the officer or in the precinct so that the reports can be compared to identify a report that does not appear to be unique and individualized to your case.  The bottom line is that a private citizen will have a very difficult time proving that a police report has been falsified in a DUI case even though it can be the critical factor in avoiding a Florida DUI conviction.

Call 1 (800) 687-2252 For a Free Consultation With a Florida DUI Lawyer In Your Area

Hiring a Florida DUI attorney to aggressively defend you can help you obtain the best possible result in your case.  Call our toll-free, Florida DUI Helpline at 1 (800) 687-2252 or search our Florida DUI Lawyer directory for a law firm near you (by appointment only).

Free eBook – How To Beat a DUI in Florida:

Florida DUI lawyer discusses the ways in which someone charged with a DUI in Florida can fight their DUI charges and possibly win their a DUI trial in Florida. Click Here For How To Beat A DUI in Florida.