Posts Tagged ‘Florida DUI 1st offense’

Port Charlotte Man Convicted of Vehicular Manslaughter Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison

Friday, August 5th, 2011

A Florida DUI criminal case involving an accident with serious injury or death often results in extremely harsh prison terms that can devastate one’s life. The recent DUI conviction of a Port Charlotte man provides a vivid example. Ronald Judson Smith, who is only 25 years old, was sentenced to a term of 30 years in state prison, which could keep him in prison for more than half his life by the time he is released. Smith also received a permanent revocation of his driver’s license.

The harsh DUI prison sentence was part of a criminal conviction on seven charges including second-degree felony manslaughter after he caused the death of a seven year old girl in a fatal DUI accident. Smith also had been charged with driving under the influence with serious bodily injury, DUI with property damage, assault on a police officer, possession of Oxycodone and Xanax without a prescription, failure to submit to a breath test and driving with a suspended license. The police indicated that Smith ran a stop sign before colliding into the other vehicle. Although Smith refused to take a blood test at the scene of the accident, a forced blood draw was taken anyway. Florida Statute Section 327.353 authorizes police officers to use “reasonable force” to draw blood as part of a DUI investigation in DUI cases involving serious bodily injury or death.

A key issue in the case was whether law enforcement officers had probable cause to take a blood draw. The defense hammered away at inconsistencies among officers regarding the smell of alcohol on Smith following the fatal DUI accident. The statute also provides that an officer must have probable cause to believe that a driver was under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance while causing a car crash that results in death or serious bodily injury. This made the issue of whether the officers actually smelled alcohol on the driver important. The driver ultimately was found to have committed DUI drugs after traces of marijuana as well as Oxycodone and Xanax were revealed by the blood test following his forced blood draw. Unlike DUI involving alcohol, DUI drugs charges do not have a fixed amount that is presumed to result in impairment.

Florida DUI law also requires that police officers that conduct accident investigations inform a suspect before initiating a DUI investigation. If the police officer believes the driver has been drinking and driving but fails to inform the driver that a DUI investigation is beginning, all of the evidence that is subsequently collected including observations of the officer, field sobriety and chemical testing may be suppressed. Smith also claimed that the accident was the result of brake failure not driving under the influence of drugs. Smith’s defense team claimed that mechanical failure rather than intoxication caused the auto accident. Causation can be a key issue in DUI vehicular manslaughter cases. Our Florida DUI attorneys recognize that anyone who is arrested for DUI resulting from a car accident involving serious injury or death faces very serious consequences. Our experienced Florida DUI defense law firm zealously represents those charged with DUI vehicular manslaughter or DUI with bodily injury. Our Florida DUI attorneys offer a free confidential consultation to discuss your charges so call us today.

Call 1 800-687-2252 to Speak With a Florida DUI lawyer In Your Area.

Hiring a Florida DUI law firm to aggressively defend you can help you obtain the best possible result in your case.  Call our toll-free, Florida DUI Advice Helpline at 1 (800) 687-2252 for a Florida DUI law firm near you (by appointment only).

When Can a Florida Officer Compel a Blood or Urine Test Following a Breath Test?

Thursday, August 4th, 2011

There are many aspects to a DUI drugs case in Florida that makes it different from driving under the influence of alcohol.  While the process may be similar in terms of the initial stop, which must be based on a traffic violation or articulable facts that a driver is engaged in illegal activity.  Once a driver is stopped an officer will typically make observations regarding the driver’s physical condition including bloodshot eyes, smell of alcohol and slurred speech.  Based on these observations the officer will then typically request that the driver submit to field sobriety tests (FSTs).  When the driver predictability fails the FSTs as expected, the case starts to get interesting.

If the officer has not uncovered specific evidence that the driver is under the influence of drugs, the officer usually will ask the driver to submit to breath testing.  If a driver has not been drinking or has consumed a negligible amount of alcohol, there is little reason for the driver to refuse to take the breath test.  If the officer still believes that a driver is intoxicated despite a breath test with a blood alcohol (BAC) test below .08 percent, the officer will then insist that the driver submit to blood or urine testing to determine if the driver is under the influence of drugs.

The problem is that the officer really has no specific evidence that the driver was under the influence of drugs merely because the driver passed the breath test.  Generally, Florida’s implied consent law requires motorists to consent to chemical testing of breath, blood or urine incident to a DUI arrest.  If a driver refuses to consent, the prosecutor can comment on the refusal as “consciousness of guilt” at trial.  The interesting question is whether the prosecutor has the same right to comment on the refusal of a blood or urine test following a driver consenting to and passing a breath test.

If you are arrested for DUI drugs our experienced Florida DUI attorneys may be able to challenge a blood or urine test that is administered after you have been determined not to be over the legal limit of .08 percent BAC by a breath test.  The key issue is usually whether the officer has specific evidence that you are under the influence of drugs.  If the officer has no specific evidence to support a belief that you are under influence of drugs beyond the fact that you passed a breath test, we may be able to have subsequent urine or blood test results suppressed or convince the judge that your refusal to submit to blood or urine test may not be used against you at trial.

While it is never advisable to drive while under the influence of drugs (or alcohol), anyone stopped who has taken any type of drug whether legal prescription, over-the-counter medication or street drug should not volunteer any information to an officer about any such drug use.  It is also important to realize that drug paraphernalia, prescription bottles or pills left in plain view in a driver’s vehicle may provide sufficient evidence of a driver being under the influence of drugs to require a urine or blood test even though the driver has successfully passed a breath test.

If you or someone you love is arrested for DUI drugs and forced to submit to a urine or blood test after successfully passing a breath test, our experienced Florida DUI defense attorneys may be able to file a motion to suppress the test results or any reference to the refusal.  Our Florida DUI defense attorneys offer a free initial consultation so call us today.

Call 1 800-687-2252 to Speak With a Florida DUI lawyer In Your Area.

Hiring a Florida DUI law firm to aggressively defend you can help you obtain the best possible result in your case.  Call our toll-free, Florida DUI Advice Helpline at 1 (800) 687-2252 for a Florida DUI law firm near you (by appointment only).